Liverpool Could Solve Transfer Mistake for Just £25m as Contract Talk Distracts Fans
When a well-known social media insider posted that Liverpool had supposedly offered £25 million for Marc Guehi before the January transfer window, the immediate responses were quite revealing.
The first few comments questioned the offer, suggesting that £25 million seemed like a significant sum for a player who only has six months left on his contract, especially considering a previous bid of £35 million. Questions were raised about the payment arrangements.
Another comment suggested that offering £25 million plus £5 million in add-ons for an early acquisition would be a poor decision, arguing that Liverpool should be getting a discount due to a previous, failed transfer attempt in August.
Finally, a third comment wondered why Liverpool would make a bid in January when they could potentially acquire Guehi for nothing in the summer.
The commenter speculated that perhaps Liverpool felt pressured to act due to interest from rival clubs like Manchester United.
First, relish that feeling of being inherently deserving, as one Liverpool supporter seems to think Palace should practically bow down and present Liverpool with a bargain (excuse me, a BARGAIN) for the player they declined to sell on the transfer deadline.
Trending
This is apparently because Liverpool delayed making a substantial offer until the final day, after wasting much of the summer chasing after an excessive number of forwards that wouldn’t even fit into a practical squad.
Then we have the notion that they can ‘effortlessly acquire him for nothing’, ignoring the fact that Real Madrid, PSG, or indeed any other major club in the world could also ‘effortlessly acquire him for nothing’.
It’s not as if there’s current proof suggesting Real have less of an allure than Liverpool, who are currently in 12th position.
The dominant feeling seems to be disbelief that anyone would pay £25 million for a player who could be acquired without a transfer fee soon.
But that’s simply wrongheaded. It’s not just paying for six months of service; it’s paying for one of the Premier League’s top central defenders for a potentially long and fruitful period of time.
This current fixation on contract lengths and the details of transfer agreements has overshadowed reasonable discussions about player acquisitions.
Liverpool urgently requires a central defender, or possibly two in the near future, and £25 million represents a truly affordable price for a player of such high caliber.
The intricacies of structuring a deal should be left to the club’s management and financial experts, not the fans, who should be more concerned with whether Liverpool can turn their season around.
And they certainly have the potential to do so, regardless of Arsenal’s strong position in the Premier League standings.
This Liverpool team might even be better equipped to excel in the higher stakes of the Champions League than in the current unpredictable domestic league season.
Reaching the Champions League semi-finals and securing a spot in the competition for the following year would likely be sufficient to dispel any idea that Arne Slot’s leadership is merely a short-lived continuation of Jurgen Klopp’s legacy.
While achieving those goals is within reach – and the tight Premier League standings indicate Liverpool’s potential for a top-four finish – significantly strengthening the team without substantial expense should be an obvious priority.
And if a £25 million transfer fee is perceived as ‘enormous’ (considering Liverpool’s higher investment in a young defender recently), then your perspective on football may have shifted away from its sporting essence.
Crystal Palace is not obligated to offer Liverpool any favors regarding a transfer. Furthermore, Guehi has even less of a reason to feel indebted to Liverpool, as they clearly didn’t prioritize him when they had the opportunity to sign him earlier in the summer.
This was a mistake on Liverpool’s part, and the chance to fix it in January for a reduced price should be seen as fortunate rather than an occasion for criticism or a feeling of deserving special treatment.
While we don’t suggest that fans ignore the financial aspects of football, immediately focusing on the specifics of the financial arrangement when hearing that your team could resolve a significant on-field issue for a reasonable sum indicates a detachment from the game’s core values.
